NAPLAN Writing Criteria Explained
A detailed breakdown of all 10 NAPLAN writing assessment criteria. Understand exactly what each criterion measures, how scoring works, and what separates each band level. Essential reading for teachers, students, and parents preparing for the NAPLAN writing test.
How NAPLAN Writing Assessment Works
Every piece of NAPLAN writing is assessed against 10 criteria divided into two groups. The first six criteria are compositional — they assess how well ideas are generated, developed, and organised. The remaining four are conventions — they assess the technical accuracy of writing.
Each criterion has its own scoring scale, ranging from 0–2 (Paragraphing for narrative) up to 0–6 (Audience, Sentence Structure, Spelling). The total possible score is 47 points for both narrative and persuasive writing. Scores are not weighted — each point counts equally toward the total.
During the national assessment, each piece of writing is marked by trained human assessors using detailed band-level descriptors. These descriptors define specific characteristics that writing must demonstrate to achieve each score level. For example, a score of 5 on Audience requires writing that "orients, engages, and affects the reader" with "sustained authorial control." A score of 2 might only require "some awareness of audience through word choice."
Compositional vs Conventions Criteria
Compositional (6 criteria)
- Audience (0–6)
- Text Structure (0–4)
- Ideas (0–5)
- Character & Setting / Persuasive Devices (0–4)
- Vocabulary (0–5)
- Cohesion (0–4)
Conventions (4 criteria)
- Paragraphing (0–2 narrative / 0–3 persuasive)
- Sentence Structure (0–6)
- Punctuation (0–5)
- Spelling (0–6)
Each Criterion in Detail
Below is a comprehensive breakdown of each NAPLAN writing criterion. For narrative-specific criteria (Character and Setting) and persuasive-specific criteria (Persuasive Devices), see our dedicated Narrative and Persuasive writing guides.
Audience
0–6CompositionalThe Audience criterion assesses how effectively the writer engages and affects the reader. It is the highest-weighted compositional criterion, reflecting the fundamental importance of writing for a reader.
Writing that orients, engages, and affects the reader with sustained control. The reader experiences the text — feeling tension, empathy, curiosity, or satisfaction. Authorial voice is confident and distinctive.
Writing that engages the reader with some deliberate choices. Awareness of audience is evident through word choice and narrative or argumentative techniques, but engagement may be inconsistent.
Writing that shows some awareness of audience, perhaps through basic word choice or an attempt to interest the reader. Engagement is limited and may not be sustained.
No evidence of audience awareness. The writing does not attempt to engage or affect the reader in any way.
Text Structure
0–4CompositionalText Structure assesses how well the writing is organised into a coherent whole. For narrative, this means orientation, complication, and resolution. For persuasive, this means introduction, body arguments, and conclusion.
A controlled, coherent text structure that supports the purpose. Narrative: well-paced story with clear orientation, developed complication, and effective resolution. Persuasive: logical argument with clear introduction, structured body, and strong conclusion.
Some evidence of structure, though it may be uneven. A narrative may have a beginning and complication but a weak resolution. A persuasive text may state a position but lack structured supporting arguments.
No recognisable structure. Events or ideas are random, disconnected, or absent.
Ideas
0–5CompositionalThe Ideas criterion evaluates the quality, relevance, and development of ideas within the writing. Strong ideas are elaborated with specific detail, not just mentioned in passing.
Ideas are well-developed with specific, relevant detail. Elaboration enhances meaning and adds depth to the narrative or argument. Ideas show insight and originality.
Ideas are present and mostly relevant but may lack depth or specific detail. Some elaboration is evident but may be uneven or generic.
Ideas are minimal, undeveloped, or irrelevant. The writing reads as a bare outline without meaningful elaboration.
Vocabulary
0–5CompositionalVocabulary assesses the range and precision of language choices. Markers look for evidence that words are chosen deliberately for effect, not just used out of habit. This includes figurative language, sensory details, and precise word choices.
Sustained, precise, and effective vocabulary choices. Includes figurative language, sensory detail, and subject-specific terminology used accurately. Words are deliberately selected for impact.
Some evidence of deliberate word choice with occasional precise or effective language. Vocabulary is mostly adequate but may rely on common or generic words in places.
Limited vocabulary with basic, everyday words. Language is repetitive with no evidence of deliberate or precise word selection.
Cohesion
0–4CompositionalCohesion measures how smoothly the text flows and how well ideas are connected. This includes linking devices (however, furthermore), referring words (pronouns, synonyms), and text connectives that create logical relationships between sentences and paragraphs.
Varied and purposeful cohesive devices that create smooth, logical flow throughout the text. Pronoun references are clear, linking words are varied, and the text reads as a unified whole rather than separate sentences.
Some cohesive devices used, though they may be simple or repetitive (and, then, but). The text has some flow but connections between ideas may be unclear in places.
No cohesive devices evident. Sentences are disconnected with no linking language.
Paragraphing
0–2 (narrative) / 0–3 (persuasive)ConventionsParagraphing assesses the ability to segment text into organised paragraphs. For narrative writing, markers look for paragraph breaks that support the story's flow and pacing. For persuasive writing, paragraphs should organise distinct arguments with clear topic sentences.
Deliberate paragraphing that supports the text's purpose. Paragraph breaks are purposeful — signalling shifts in time, focus, speaker, or argument. In persuasive writing, each paragraph develops a distinct point.
Some paragraphing is evident but may be inconsistent or not always purposeful. Some breaks support the text while others seem random.
No paragraphing. The entire text is written as a single block of text with no paragraph breaks.
Sentence Structure
0–6ConventionsSentence Structure is one of the highest-scored conventions criteria. It assesses grammatical correctness, structural soundness, and the variety of sentence types used. Markers look for a controlled mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Confident control of a wide variety of sentence structures. Mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences used deliberately for effect. Virtually error-free grammar with sophisticated constructions.
Mostly correct sentence structures with some variety. May include compound and some complex sentences, though control may be inconsistent. Occasional grammatical errors that don't impede meaning.
Simple or repetitive sentence structures with frequent grammatical errors. Sentences may be incomplete (fragments) or run-on. Limited evidence of sentence variety.
Punctuation
0–5ConventionsPunctuation assesses the correct and appropriate use of punctuation marks at both sentence level (full stops, commas, question marks) and within sentences (apostrophes, quotation marks, colons, semicolons). Higher scores require a wider range of punctuation used accurately.
Accurate use of a full range of punctuation. Includes correct dialogue punctuation, apostrophes for possession and contraction, commas in clauses and lists, and potentially advanced marks like semicolons, colons, or dashes.
Mostly correct use of basic punctuation (full stops, capital letters, some commas). May attempt more complex punctuation with some accuracy. Occasional errors but meaning is clear.
Inconsistent or absent use of even basic punctuation. Capital letters and full stops may be missing or random. No evidence of punctuation beyond the most basic marks.
Spelling
0–6ConventionsSpelling is scored based on both the accuracy and the difficulty of words used. Crucially, the scoring rewards students who attempt ambitious vocabulary and spell it correctly, rather than playing it safe with only simple words. The scale considers four word categories: simple, common, challenging, and difficult.
Virtually all words spelled correctly, including difficult and challenging words. The student attempts and successfully spells ambitious vocabulary, demonstrating both wide word knowledge and spelling accuracy.
Most common and some challenging words spelled correctly. Errors may appear in more difficult words but are phonetically reasonable. The student attempts some ambitious vocabulary.
Frequent errors in common words, or the student avoids challenging vocabulary entirely. Spelling of simple words may be correct but limited range demonstrates constrained word knowledge.
The NAPLAN Scoring Process
During the official NAPLAN assessment, student writing is marked by trained human assessors recruited and trained by ACARA. Markers attend training sessions where they score sample papers and calibrate their understanding of the band-level descriptors. Throughout the marking period, quality assurance checks ensure consistency across markers.
Each criterion is scored independently. Markers read the student's writing and compare it against the band-level descriptors for each criterion, selecting the score that best matches what the writing demonstrates. When a response falls between two score levels, the conservative (lower) score is awarded. This is known as the "best fit" approach.
WritingGrade applies the same approach using AI. Each criterion is evaluated independently against the official band-level descriptors. The AI provides not just a score but also specific evidence from the student's writing and reasoning for the score awarded. This transparency helps teachers and students understand exactly why a particular score was given and what would need to change to achieve a higher score.
NAPLAN Criteria FAQ
Are the NAPLAN writing criteria the same for all year levels?
Yes, the same 10 criteria and scoring scales are used for Years 3, 5, 7, and 9. However, the band-level descriptors set progressively higher expectations for older students. A score of 4 on Audience means different things for a Year 3 student compared to a Year 9 student in terms of national benchmarks.
What is the difference between compositional and conventions criteria?
Compositional criteria assess the quality of ideas and how they are organised — Audience, Text Structure, Ideas, Character and Setting (or Persuasive Devices), Vocabulary, and Cohesion. Conventions criteria assess technical accuracy — Paragraphing, Sentence Structure, Punctuation, and Spelling. Both groups contribute to the total score.
How are NAPLAN writing scores used?
Individual scores are reported to parents and schools. Schools use them to identify areas for improvement in their writing programs. National data is aggregated by ACARA to track trends across Australia. Teachers can use criterion-level scores to plan targeted instruction for individual students or whole classes.
Can a student score zero on a criterion?
Yes. A score of zero is awarded when the writing shows no evidence of the skill described by that criterion, or when the response is too short to assess. For example, a student who writes only one or two sentences may receive zero on multiple criteria because there is insufficient text to demonstrate those skills.
What happens if a student writes off-topic?
Students who write completely off-topic can still receive scores for technical criteria like Sentence Structure, Punctuation, and Spelling. However, compositional criteria like Ideas and Text Structure will score lower because the writing does not address the prompt. Markers assess what is written, regardless of topic adherence.
How does WritingGrade assess against these criteria?
WritingGrade uses AI calibrated against the official NAPLAN marking guide descriptors. Each criterion is scored independently using the same band-level definitions that trained human markers use. The AI provides a score, evidence from the student’s writing, and reasoning for each criterion, plus targeted improvement suggestions.
See These Criteria in Action
Upload student writing and get instant scores across all 10 NAPLAN criteria with evidence and improvement suggestions for each.
Try NAPLAN Assessment Free