NAPLAN Persuasive Writing Guide

What Is NAPLAN Persuasive Writing?

NAPLAN persuasive writing requires students to argue a position on a topic presented as a prompt. Unlike narrative writing, which tells a story, persuasive writing aims to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint. Students must take a clear stance on the issue, support their position with reasons and evidence, and use language that persuades the reader.

Persuasive writing is assessed using the same 10-criterion framework as narrative writing, with one key difference: the Character and Setting criterion is replaced by Persuasive Devices. This criterion specifically evaluates the student's use of rhetorical techniques to strengthen their argument. The Paragraphing criterion also has a slightly expanded scale (0–3 instead of 0–2) reflecting the importance of paragraph structure in argumentative writing.

The total possible score for persuasive writing is 48 points (one more than narrative's 47, due to the expanded Paragraphing scale). Students are assessed on both the quality of their argument (compositional skills) and the accuracy of their language (conventions). A strong persuasive essay demonstrates both compelling reasoning and technical control.

Types of Persuasive Writing Prompts

NAPLAN persuasive prompts typically present a debatable topic relevant to the student's age group. Examples might include whether schools should have uniforms, whether homework should be banned, or whether children should have access to social media. The prompt asks students to express and justify their opinion, usually beginning with a question or statement like "Should..." or "Do you agree that...".

Students can argue for or against the proposition — there is no "right" answer. What matters is how well they construct and support their argument. Students who choose a position they genuinely believe in tend to write more convincingly, but strong writers can argue either side effectively.

How to Structure a Persuasive Essay

A well-structured persuasive essay presents arguments in a logical order that builds to a compelling conclusion. While there is no single correct structure, the following approach consistently scores well in NAPLAN assessment.

1. Introduction

Open with a hook that captures the reader’s attention — a striking fact, a rhetorical question, or a bold statement. Then clearly state your position on the topic. The reader should know exactly where you stand within the first paragraph. Briefly preview your main arguments to set up the structure of your essay.

2. Body Paragraphs

Each body paragraph should focus on a single argument that supports your position. Start with a clear topic sentence, provide evidence or reasoning, and explain how this supports your overall argument. Aim for 2–4 body paragraphs depending on the depth of your arguments. Arrange paragraphs strategically — many effective essays place the strongest argument last for maximum impact.

3. Counter-Argument (Optional but Rewarded)

Acknowledging and refuting an opposing viewpoint demonstrates sophisticated thinking and scores well on the Persuasive Devices criterion. Keep this concise — acknowledge the opposing view in one sentence, then explain why your position is stronger. This can be woven into a body paragraph or stand as a separate paragraph.

4. Conclusion

Restate your position using different words. Summarise your strongest points without introducing new arguments. End with a powerful closing statement — a call to action, a thought-provoking question, or a statement that reinforces the importance of the issue. A strong conclusion leaves a lasting impression on the reader.